Overview
Comment: | [fr][js] conj generator: Array.from() is much more readable than .slice(0) to clone an Array |
---|---|
Downloads: | Tarball | ZIP archive | SQL archive |
Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | fr | multid |
Files: | files | file ages | folders |
SHA3-256: |
33dbc61ec2e8400e383edf12c66afe2d |
User & Date: | olr on 2018-03-11 23:39:11 |
Other Links: | branch diff | manifest | tags |
Context
2018-03-12
| ||
12:12 | [tb] lexicon editor: ui update check-in: 600f33b256 user: olr tags: tb, multid | |
2018-03-11
| ||
23:39 | [fr][js] conj generator: Array.from() is much more readable than .slice(0) to clone an Array check-in: 33dbc61ec2 user: olr tags: fr, multid | |
23:28 | [fr][bug] conj generator: clone array/list before adding elements check-in: 2ce9bd0c2a user: olr tags: fr, multid | |
Changes
Modified gc_lang/fr/modules-js/conj_generator.js from [d5f86107a9] to [354852a8f0].
︙ | |||
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 | - - + - + - + - + - + - + | if (sVerb.endsWith("re")) { return "3"; } return "4"; }, getConjRules: function (sVerb, bVarPpas=true, nGroup=2) { |
︙ |